Robinson

\ 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER, No. 1:21-cv-01364 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE

RELIEF

DAVID ROBINSON, et al., (Docs. 22, 27) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff filed a motion requesting injunctive relief in this action. (Doc. 22.) The assigned magistrate judge found injunctive relief was not appropriate because no defendant has been served. (Doc. 27 at 5, citing, e.g., Zepeda v. INS, 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9th Cir. 1983).) In addition, the magistrate judge determined that “Plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits or the existence of serious questions going to the merits and the balance of hardships tipping in Plaintiff’s favor.” (Id.) Furthermore, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to show “he would suffer irreparable harm without preliminary relief” or that the many forms of relief requested were narrowly drawn to correct…