(PC) Littleton v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20222:22-cv-00567California467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, Case No. 2:22-cv-00567-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE,

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS Defendants. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

17 On April 7, 2022, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. On May 24, 2022, I granted plaintiff a thirty-day extension of time to comply with that order. ECF No. 9. To date, plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.