Deol
VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc. v. Deol
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIBRANTCARE REHABILITATION, No. 2:20-cv-00791-MCE-AC
INC,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 KIRAN DEOL, and John and Jane Does 1 through 10, Defendant. 17 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to compel discovery. ECF No. 46. The matter was taken under submission on the papers. ECF No. 47. The parties submitted the required joint statement. ECF No. 48. Based on a review of all papers filed, the court DENIES defendant’s motion. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff VibrantCare is one of the largest providers of outpatient physical and occupational therapy services in the Western United States. ECF No. 23 at 2. Plaintiff hired defendant Kiran Deol in March of 2018 as a corporate recruiter. Id. In that role, Deol was responsible for finding, soliciting, and hiring qualified therapists for VibrantCare’s operations. Doel later promoted to Director of Recruiting, where she was responsible for the oversight…