Russell
(PC) Hicks v. Russell
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20222:22-cv-00095California1,146 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DARYL ANTHONY HICKS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00095-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
v. PAUPERIS RUSSELL, et al., ECF No. 2 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH HIS
FIRST AND EIGHTH AMENDMENT
CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT
RUSSELL; OR
17 (2) DELAY SERVING ANY DEFENDANT AND FILE AN
AMENDED COMPLAINT
19 ECF No. 1
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
22 23 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that the defendant correctional officers violated his rights by failing to protect him from being harmed by other inmates, retaliating against him for calling the Prison Rape Elimination Act (“PREA”) hotline, and using excessive force against him. I have screened the complaint and determined that it states viable First and Eighth Amendment claims against…