Ortiz

Ortiz v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20221:22-cv-00587California168 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

ROBERT ORTIZ,

Case No. 1:22-cv-00587-EPG Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

9 || DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

|| HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., (ECF No. 8) Defendants. 12 On June 30, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice voluntarily dismissing this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)@). (ECF No. 8). Therefore, 1S this action has been terminated with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of 16 San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully 17 directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines, assign a district judge to this case for 18 the purposes of closing the case, and then to close the case. 19 20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21 39 || Dated: _ July 1, 2022 [spe ey

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28