(SS) Vincent v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN LYNN BIRDSONG VINCENT, No. 2:21-cv-926-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No 24.) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15 Defendant. 16 On May 24, 2022, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security and issued its judgment. (ECF No. 21.) On June 24, 2022, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 23.) Thereafter, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with this court. (See ECF No. 24.) “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). The good faith standard under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is an objective one. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). A plaintiff satisfies the 26 1 This action was…