(HC) Coleman v. Yolo County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELUS COLEMAN, No. 2:21-cv-2328 TLN AC P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 15, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 12. On May 24, 2022, petitioner was ordered to file and serve, within twenty-one days, an opposition or statement of non-opposition to that motion. ECF No. 14. In the same order, petitioner was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed…