Magee

Magee v. Christianson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20221:21-cv-00670California8,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 HOPE MAGEE, individually and as CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00670-AWI-BAM Successor in Interest to JACOREY SHAW, deceased, et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS BY TUOLUMNE COUNTY, Plaintiff, RODNEY HOBBS, OLIVER IMLACH AND BILL POOLEY vs. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ADAM CHRISTIANSON, et al., 11 Defendants. (Doc. No. 19)

13

15 This action involves federal civil rights claims against Tuolumne County, Stanislaus County and eleven individual defendants (the “Individual Defendants”) in connection with an inmate death. Defendants Tuolumne County, Rodney Hobbs, Oliver Imlach and Bill Pooley1 bring a motion to dismiss all seven of the claims against them in First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Doc. No. 19. The motion has been fully briefed and deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.