Rockwell

Rockwell v. Tuolumne County, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20221:22-cv-00392California726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLAN THOMAS ROCKWELL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00392-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al., TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, DENYING

MOTION IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 35) 16 Plaintiff Allan Thomas Rockwell (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action against Tuolumne County, Michael Choate, Denise Choate, and Melissa Brouhard. (See ECF No. 1.) The First Amended Complaint indicates that this action is brought by Plaintiff and by G.A.R., a minor, proceeding pro se. (See ECF No. 5.) On May 4, 2022, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why G.A.R.’s claims should not be dismissed without prejudice. (ECF No. 8) Plaintiff was directed to file a written response within fourteen (14) days of service. (Id.) On May 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a response to the May 4, 2022 order to show cause, along with a motion for an extension…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.