Satterfield

(PC) Fernandez v. Satterfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20221:19-cv-01220California733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE FERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01220-DAD-BAK (EPG) (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

v. WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

SATTERFIELD, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Jorge Fernandez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On April 19, 2022, Defendants Bick, Boyette, Darby, Eslick, Flores, Salzer, and Satterfield (“Defendants”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 64.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), and as explained in Defendants’ Notice of Motion (id. at 2), Plaintiff had 21 days to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to respond in any way. // On May 19,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.