Bick

(PC) Tunstall v. Bick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20222:16-cv-02604California1,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, JR., No. 2:16-CV-2604-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOSEPH BICK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status, ECF No. 116, and Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 123. 21 I. BACKGROUND On November 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed his original complaint alleging failure to provide Plaintiff with treatment for neurological disorders, dementia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). See EFC No. 1, 2. Plaintiff also alleges in his third amended complaint that Plaintiff is epileptic, forgetful, cognitively impaired, has hearing issues, and expresses bad behavior because of a brain surgery-related personality disorder. See EFC No. 57, 2. According 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.