(PS) Creel v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20222:22-cv-01058California1,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD CREEL, No. 2:22–cv–1058–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S (ECF No. 2.) DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). Plaintiff’s affidavit makes the required financial showing, and so plaintiff’s request is granted. See, e.g., Ketschau v. Byrne, 2019 WL 5266889, *1 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 17, 2019) (“A person is eligible if they are unable to pay the costs of filing and still provide the necessities of life . . . This generally includes . . . persons who are unemployed and dependent on government assistance.”). However, the determination that a plaintiff may proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.