Arviza
(HC) Shrader v. Arviza
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20221:22-cv-00528California486 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS CREIGHTON SHRADER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00528-SAB-HC
Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
M. ARVIZA, TO FILE INSTANT ORDER AND
PETITION IN SHRADER V. GARLAND,
Respondent. NO. 1:21-CV-01229, AND
ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE
15 (ECF No. 7)
17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241.
19 Petitioner previously filed a petition for writ of mandamus in Shrader v. Garland, No. 20 1:21-cv-01229-AWI-JLT.1 The Court interpreted the petition as challenging a state sentence and 21 dismissed the petition. Id., ECF Nos. 5, 8. Petitioner appealed. On April 14, 2022, the Ninth 22 Circuit vacated the judgment because the district court had misinterpreted Petitioner’s claim and 23 remanded to provide Petitioner an opportunity to properly raise his claim in a petition for writ of 24 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Id., ECF No. 13. 25 On May 3, 2022, Petitioner…