Arviza

(HC) Shrader v. Arviza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20221:22-cv-00528California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS CREIGHTON SHRADER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00528-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

M. ARVIZA, TO FILE INSTANT ORDER AND

PETITION IN SHRADER V. GARLAND,

Respondent. NO. 1:21-CV-01229, AND

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE

15 (ECF No. 7)

17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241.

19 Petitioner previously filed a petition for writ of mandamus in Shrader v. Garland, No. 20 1:21-cv-01229-AWI-JLT.1 The Court interpreted the petition as challenging a state sentence and 21 dismissed the petition. Id., ECF Nos. 5, 8. Petitioner appealed. On April 14, 2022, the Ninth 22 Circuit vacated the judgment because the district court had misinterpreted Petitioner’s claim and 23 remanded to provide Petitioner an opportunity to properly raise his claim in a petition for writ of 24 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Id., ECF No. 13. 25 On May 3, 2022, Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.