Griesbach

(PC) Luedtke v. Griesbach

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20221:21-cv-00718California1,840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LUEDTKE,

Plaintiff, No. 1:21-cv-00718-TLN-HBK

13 v. ORDER

WILLIAM GREISBACH, KIRK OBEAR,

KARINE MORENO-TAXMAN, GINA

COLLETTI, RUDOPH RANDA,

ANTHONY ISHII, STANLEY BOONE,

BARBARA MCAULIFFE, DALE

DROZD, SHEILA OBERTO,

18 Defendants,

20 This matter is before the Court on its March 9, 2022 Order to Show Cause as to why Plaintiff James Luedtke (“Plaintiff”) should not be deemed a vexatious litigant. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was given thirty days to respond. (Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. For the reasons listed below, the Court finds that Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant pro se suit against multiple Defendants, alleging various federal and state law violations. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to the Pro Se Three Strike Database, the assigned magistrate judge found that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.