Griesbach
(PC) Luedtke v. Griesbach
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20221:21-cv-00718California1,840 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LUEDTKE,
Plaintiff, No. 1:21-cv-00718-TLN-HBK
13 v. ORDER
WILLIAM GREISBACH, KIRK OBEAR,
KARINE MORENO-TAXMAN, GINA
COLLETTI, RUDOPH RANDA,
ANTHONY ISHII, STANLEY BOONE,
BARBARA MCAULIFFE, DALE
DROZD, SHEILA OBERTO,
18 Defendants,
20 This matter is before the Court on its March 9, 2022 Order to Show Cause as to why Plaintiff James Luedtke (“Plaintiff”) should not be deemed a vexatious litigant. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was given thirty days to respond. (Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. For the reasons listed below, the Court finds that Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant pro se suit against multiple Defendants, alleging various federal and state law violations. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to the Pro Se Three Strike Database, the assigned magistrate judge found that…