Estate of Xander Mann v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20221:21-cv-01098California3,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF XANDER MANN, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO AMEND THE

v. COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. 30) Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiffs Estate of Xander Mann, Amy Pickering, and Justin Mann (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint, filed April 8, 2022.1 (Doc. 30.) Defendants County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department, and Jeff Dirkse (collectively, “County Defendants”) filed an opposition brief on April 22, 2022. (Doc. 33.) That same day, Defendant Gerardo Zazueta filed a separate opposition brief. (Doc. 34.) Plaintiff filed a reply brief on April 26, 2022. (Doc. 35.) After having reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material, the matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the hearing was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.