Brown
Brown v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CAROLYN BROWN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00186-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs and Counter- ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED Defendants, IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 v. (ECF No. 109)
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, Defendant and Counterclaimant. 17 On January 9, 2020, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Carolyn Brown (“Brown”) and Mecca Morgan (“Morgan”), appearing pro se, filed this property insurance coverage dispute action in the Superior Court of California, County of Madera. On February 5, 2020, Defendant and Counterclaimant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford (“Defendant” or “Hartford”), removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On March 30, 2022, judgment was entered in favor of Hartford. (ECF No. 105.) On April 20, 2022, Brown and Morgan filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 106.) On April 22, 2022, Brown filed a motion to 26 …