Kaur

(PC) Klinefelter v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20222:20-cv-01429California1,397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 5 JEFFREY SCOTT KLINEFELTER, Case No. 2:20-cv-01429-JAM-JDP (PC) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER BE v. GRANTED 8 GURMEET KAUR, ECF No. 35

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED

ECF No.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

13 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who alleges that defendant Kaur violated his First Amendment right to access the courts when she refused to make copies for him and denied him envelopes. ECF No. 12 at 3. He has filed a motion for summary judgment that should be denied.

Additionally, defendant has filed a motion to amend her answer, which I will grant. Defendant’s Motion to Amend Answer Defendant has asked to amend her answer to include various affirmative defenses that were mistakenly omitted in the original. ECF No. 35 at 1. More than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.