(PC) Richson-Bey v. Bell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20221:22-cv-00447California4,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SEAN JEFFERY RICHSON-BEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00447-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO ACTION BELL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE,

Defendant. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 7) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 Plaintiff Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 7.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.