Strojnik

Strojnik v. Panera Bread Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20221:22-cv-00682California1,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER STROJNIK, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0682 JLT BAK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S v. ) APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA ) PANERA BREAD COMPANY, ) PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO ) PAY THE FILING FEE Defendant. ) ) (Docs. 3, 5, 6)

Peter Strojnik asserts Panera Bread Company violated his accessibility rights arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the Disabled Persons Act. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and completed the Court’s long-form application. (Doc. 3 at 1-5.) He supplemented the application with a “Verified Notice of Submission of Long Form IFP (Form AO 239) with Explanatory Notes.” (Doc. 3 at 6-10.) On June 24, 2022, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations related to the pending IFP application. (Doc. 5.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.