Camacho

(PC) Bishop v. Camacho

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20222:20-cv-01762California1,644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Case No. 2:20-cv-01762-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

AND PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS BE DISMISSED

P. CAMACHO, FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendant.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS

13 ECF No. 72

15 Plaintiff alleges that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment rights by sexually harassing him and placing him in danger of physical assault by other inmates. He also alleges that defendant violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for filing a grievance against her. Defendant has now filed a motion for summary judgment that argues plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this suit. ECF No. 72. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 73, and defendant has filed a reply, ECF No. 74. I recommend that defendant’s motion be granted and this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.