(PC) Stuckey v. Nestle Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20221:20-cv-00511California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00511-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE

FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

NESTLE CORPORATION, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Andre Kenneth Stuckey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On October 14, 2021, the Court issued a second screening order finding that Plaintiff’s third amended complaint failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Doc. 27.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a fourth amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days (Id. at 9.) Plaintiff was then granted four extensions of time within to file his fourth amended complaint. (Docs. 30, 32, 34, 36.) In its April 5, 2022 Order—the most…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.