Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNEY PETILLO, No. 2:19-cv-00667-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On January 5, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 82.) On February 17, 2022, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 86.) Concurrently, the Court: (1) granted Defendants Mallot, J. Jones, A. Herrera, Castello, and Villasenor’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgement; and (2) dismissed Defendant Castello for failure to effect timely service of process. (Id.) Judgement was entered and the case was thus closed. (ECF Nos. 86, 87.) Shortly after, Sidney Petillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 88.) “Under Rule 59(e), a motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly…