(PC)Watkins

(PC)Watkins v. Klein

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20222:20-cv-01360California397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MAURICE WATKINS, No. 2:20-cv-1360 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff claims officers failed to protect him in violation of his Eighth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 45.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.