Ross

(PS) Ferreira da Silva v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20222:21-cv-01208California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA FERREIRA DA SILVA, No. 2:21-cv-1208-KJM-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JONATHAN KEVIN ROSS, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 28, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was subsequently granted an extension of time up to and including December 17, 2021, to file objections to the October 28, 2021 findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.