Walker

Walker v. Child Protective Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20221:22-cv-00466California577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSS DANIEL WALKER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00466-AWI-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. A RC ECTI OO MN M S EH NO DU EL DD FN OO RT DB IE S MISSAL 12 (Doc. 7) CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al.,

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

15 _____________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff Ross Daniel Walker is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (See Doc. 6.) Plaintiff filed his complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on April 11, 2022. (Doc. 1). The case was transferred, sua sponte, to this Court on April 19, 2022. (See Doc. 4.) On May 24, 2022, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 7.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time in which to do so. The Local Rules of the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.