Scott

(PC) Carthen v. Scott

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20221:19-cv-00227California601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TREMANE DARNELL CARTHEN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00227-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING

v. RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO DISMISS P. SCOTT, et al., (ECF No. 58) Defendants. 15 Tremane Carthen (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery, including the deadline for the parties to provide scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 58). On May 18, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that, among other reasons, “[t]he claims must be dismissed because, under the two-step analysis set forth in Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843 (2017), this Court cannot create an individual damages remedy in this new context.” (ECF No. 54, p. 1). On June 3, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to stay discovery, including the deadline for the parties to provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.