Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20222:17-cv-01326California1,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, Case No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING (1) PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY,

v. (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND

BEN ALENCASTRE, et al., (3) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN

EXTENSION

Defendants. ECF Nos. 174, 175, 179 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner without counsel alleging claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In addition to renewing her motion to appoint counsel, plaintiff has filed several motions to compel further discovery from defendant Deppe.1 Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 174, is her eleventh since this suit began. See ECF No. 169 (noting that plaintiff has filed ten motions for the appointment of counsel). As plaintiff has previously been informed, she does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.