Carbajal

Carbajal v. Fresno Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20221:21-cv-01825California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON T. CARBAJAL, Case No. 1:21-cv-01825-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 8) FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

16 The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 8.) The magistrate judge also found that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20. Plaintiff filed objections on July 5, 2022. (Doc. 9.) According to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Although Plaintiff’s objections attempt to cure Rule 8 pleading deficiencies, they fail to address any of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.