James

James v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20222:18-cv-00180California3,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL JAMES,

Plaintiff No. 2:18-cv-00180-TLN-DB v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., ORDER Defendants,

16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants the County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Scott R. Jones, Deputy Lee, Deputy E. Meier, Deputy Robinson, Deputy McMahon, Deputy Ditto, Deputy Vlasak, Deputy Ramos-Quintanilla, Deputy Gleason, Deputy Brown, Deputy Parker, and Deputy Williams (“Defendants”) Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) 12(b)(5) and 4(m). (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff Daniel James (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 26.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 30.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss the Complaint. /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit on January 26, 2018, alleging Defendants violated 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.