Quick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

PROVIDE RAND NOTICE AND COPY OF

v. LOCAL RULE 260; PERMITTING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED

JASON QUICK, et al., OPPOSITION BRIEF Defendants. (ECF No. 108) 14 15 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 16 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have moved for summary 17 judgment, which Plaintiff opposes, offering his declaration as support. (See ECF No. 108, 115, 18 117). 19 Upon review of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, it appears that Defendants 20 have not, as required by the scheduling order, “simultaneously provide[d] Plaintiff with the notice 21 and warning required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998),” which provides 22 important information regarding what a plaintiff must do to properly oppose a motion for 23 summary judgment. (ECF No. 76, p. 6).…