Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20222:17-cv-01326California1,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 5 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, Case No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-JDP (PC) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER v. BE GRANTED 8 BEN ALENCASTRE and KEVIN ECF No. 184 DEPPE,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED ECF No. 183

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

13 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner bringing claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). She alleges that defendants violated her constitutional rights when they sexually assaulted her during two searches of her person. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment and defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order. I recommend that the former be denied, and I order that the second be granted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment I. Legal Standards Summary judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.