Allison

(PC) Hill v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20222:22-cv-00718California452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Cymeyon Hill, No. 2:22-cv-00718-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Kathleen Allison, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 On June 10, 2022, the court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, ordering the plaintiff to pay the filing fee. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 12, and objections to the court’s order, ECF No. 13. A motion for reconsideration or relief from a judgment is appropriately brought under either Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b). Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F.2d 1437, 1442 (9th Cir. 1991) 22 (citation omitted). The filing is timely under both rules. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (setting a 28-day 23 window to file the motion); Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1) (motion must be “made within a reasonable 24 time”). Under Rule 59(e), three grounds may justify reconsideration: (1) an intervening change in 25 controlling law; (2) the availability of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.