Driver
Driver v. Fresno US Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, No. 1:22-cv-00623-DAD-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
FRESNO US COURT, et al., PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND REQUIRING
Defendants. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE TO
PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION
16 (Doc. No. 13) 17 Plaintiff Billy Driver is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action, which he filed on May 24, 2022. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on May 24, 2022. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 7, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied on the grounds that plaintiff was subject to the three strikes bar under 28…