Kan

22 DM, LP v. Kan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20222:22-cv-00754California895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 22 DM, LP, a California limited No. 2:22-cv-00754-MCE-DB partnership, and SCOTT JACOBY, as trustee of the CAMINO CIELO TRUST u/t/d 2022, ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 JOHNNY KAN, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendant. 18 Plaintiffs filed this unlawful detainer action in the Placer County Superior Court, after which Defendant removed it here ostensibly pursuant to the Court’s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. ECF No. 3. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED.1 A defendant may remove any civil action from state court to federal district court if the district court has original jurisdiction over the matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). “The party invoking the removal statute bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction.” Ethridge v. Harbor House Rest., 861 F.2d 1389, 1393 (9th Cir. 1988) (citing Williams v. 27 1 Because oral argument would not have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.