Bonta

(PS) Rogers v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20222:22-cv-00314California1,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, No. 2:22–cv–314–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER

v. ROB BONTA, et al., Defendants. 16 In February of 2022, plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, filed claims against defendant Rob Bonta and an unnamed officer of the California Attorney General’s office (among others). The court found potential claims in screening, granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, and ordered service on defendant Bonta. (ECF No. 3.) On June 22, 2022, defendant Bonta filed a motion to dismiss, setting the matter for a July 26 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 18.) Under the court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was obligated to respond to defendant’s motion at least fourteen days after the motion was filed: or July 6, 2022. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the motion was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.