(HC)Beaton
(HC)Beaton v. Payan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 22-cv-0701-KJM-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER PAYAN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 24, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations. ECF No. 9. The magistrate judge found petitioner’s claim was unripe because petitioner brought a habeas challenge regarding a transfer that had yet to take place. The findings and recommendations served on petitioner contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. As petitioner has not informed the court that the transfer has indeed taken place, nothing in the…