Juarez

(PC) Richson-Bey v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20221:22-cv-00567California2,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN JEFFERY RICHSON-BEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00567-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION

JUAREZ, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

Defendant. CLAIMS

(ECF Nos. 1, 6, 7)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 I. Background Plaintiff Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 30, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for excessive force against Defendant J. Juarez, for the incident on September 21, 2021, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims. (ECF No. 6.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.