Beard

Beard v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20221:21-cv-00841California8,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-DAD-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.,

ORDER VACATING JULY 13, 2022

Defendants. HEARING

(ECF Nos. 32, 34, 35)

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”)1 to produce documents in response to Plaintiff Beard’s requests for production (“RPD”), set one. (ECF No. 32.) Defendant filed an opposition and the parties filed a joint statement re: discovery disagreement on June 29, 2022 (ECF Nos. 34, 35.) The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and the parties will not be required to appear on July 13, 2022. See Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiffs’ motion shall be granted in 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.