A.H.

A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20222:21-cv-00690California2,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] A.H., et al., No. 2:21-cv-00690-KJM-JDP Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services, et al., Defendants. 17 The defendants move to dismiss the claims of Cynthia Martin and her three minor children, A.H., E.H. and C.G. The court grants the motion. 20 I. PLEADINGS The parties disagree at the outset about which is the operative complaint: (1) the first amended complaint, which the plaintiffs have titled the “Fifth Amended Complaint,” ECF No. 41; or (2) its purported successor, the document the plaintiffs title the “Sixth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 44. The plaintiffs have not explained their unconventional numbering scheme, but the court adopts it to avoid further confusion. The plaintiffs argue the sixth amended complaint is their controlling pleading. See Opp’n at 4-6, ECF No. 48. The defendants contend 27 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.