Stokes

(DP) Slaughter v. Stokes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20221:05-cv-00922California329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER, Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD

Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE

v. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of the SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND California State Prison at San Quentin, SCHEDULING ORDER 15 Respondent. (Doc. No. 153)

17 On July 6, 2022, counsel for petitioner moved the court for an order allowing supplemental briefing on the effect of the Supreme Court’s recent opinions in Shinn v. Ramirez, __U.S.__, 142 S. Ct. 1718 (2022) and Shoop v. Twyford, __U.S.__, 142 S. Ct. 2037 (2022), on his pending Corrected Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, Expansion of the Record and Discovery, filed November 2, 2020. Petitioner has provided a proposed briefing schedule with his motion. Counsel for petitioner represents that counsel for respondent, Deputy Attorney General Ryan McConnell, does not oppose the motion and the proposed schedule for supplemental briefing. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.