Shetty

Shetty v. City of Folsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20222:22-cv-00534California1,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARI SHETTY, et al., No. 2:22-cv-00534-JAM-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF FOLSOM, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (“MTD”). See Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 10. Defendant replied. See Reply, ECF No. 11. Plaintiffs brought seven claims (three under federal law and four under California state law) against Defendant. See First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Ex. AS to Notice of Removal, ECF No. 2-15. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege that Defendant City’s at-large election

1 The matter was heard on June 28, 2022. system discouraged candidates from minority neighborhoods and reduced voter participation in Asian and Latino communities in violation of state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.