Rockwell
Rockwell v. Tuolumne County, California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLAN THOMAS ROCKWELL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00392-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR PERMISSION TO E-FILE
TUOLUMNE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., (ECF No. 36) 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Allan Thomas Rockwell (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action against 18 Tuolumne County, Michael Choate, Denise Choate, and Melissa Brouhard (“Defendants”). (See 19 ECF No. 1.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request that he be allowed to use the CM/ECF system 20 to file documents electronically in this case. (ECF No. 36.) Specifically, Plaintiff requests that 21 Heather Schoon, his “Power of Attorney/Attorney-in-Fact,” be allowed to e-file documents on his 22 behalf for this case because Plaintiff is incarcerated and it is a hardship for Ms. Schoon to travel 23 to his place of detention to obtain Plaintiff’s signature and then to Fresno for each filing. (Id.) 24 Under the Court’s Local Rules, pro se parties are required to “file and serve paper 25…