(PS) Hedrington v. County of Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20222:21-cv-00414California329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Orlonzo Hedrington, No. 2:21-cv-00414-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Solano et al., 1S Defendants. 16 In December 2021, this court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Prev. Order (Dec. 15, 2021), ECF No. 41. The court granted summary judgment as to defendants David Grant Medical Center and the United States of America and remanded the remaining action to Solano County Superior Court. /d. at 2. Mr. Hedrington now brings three motions for reconsideration. ECF Nos. 44, 45, 48. Defendants have opposed 22 reconsideration. ECF No. 46. While a court may relieve a party from an order under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for “mistake, inadvertence, fraud, or excusable neglect” or for “any other reason 25 that justifies relief,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), (b)(6), plaintiff does not claim new or different facts 26 or circumstances…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.