Grether

(PC) Walker v. Grether

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20222:22-cv-00463California374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOEVON VIYALE WALKER, Case No. 2:22-cv-00463-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

K. GRETHER, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On June 6, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that his complaint did not state cognizable claims, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 11. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.