Kiebler

(HC) Chappell v. Kiebler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20222:22-cv-00259California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLAKE CHAPPELL, No. 2:22-cv-0259 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER B. KIEBLER, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Docket No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 2, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Docket No. 8.) Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Docket No. 9.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.