Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREDERICK LEONARD, No. 2:21-cv-0930 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER

MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

M. STRAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On June 13, 2022, defendants filed a motion to compel discovery responses, and a request to modify the scheduling order in light of plaintiff’s failure to respond to discovery. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff was required to oppose defendants’ motion within twenty-one days. No opposition was filed. As set forth below, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why defendants’ motion to compel discovery should not be granted, and defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order is granted. On June 13, 2022, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address reflecting his release from state prison. Plaintiff is advised that he is still required to prosecute his pending court actions. Moreover, plaintiff is cautioned…