Schaupp

Schaupp v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20221:22-cv-00849California1,654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLYN SCHAUPP, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00849-JLT-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

v. AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION On July 11, 2022, Carolyn Schaupp filed a pro se complaint alleging various violations of state and federal law. (Doc. 1 (“Compl.”).)1 Also on July 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Doc. 5.) The Complaint, which is 120 pages long not including more than 100 pages of attachments, advances a long list of claims 22 1 This is not Plaintiff’s first lawsuit. She filed a similar lawsuit on August 28, 2020: 1:20-cv-01221-DAD-BAM Schaupp et al. v. County of Stanislaus et al. (Schaupp I). In Schaupp I, the District Judge Dale A. Drozd denied a request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on September 25, 2020, (Schaupp I,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.