Garrett

Garrett v. Hine

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20221:21-cv-00845California4,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW GARRETT, et al., No. 1:21-cv-0845-DAD-BAK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES CHRISTOPHER W. HINE, et al., Defendants. 16 On June 8, 2022, this court issued an order granting defendants’ request for attorneys’ fees pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute. (Doc. No. 32.) This matter is now before the court following the submission of supplemental briefing by the parties regarding what the reasonable attorneys’ fees awarded in this action should be. (Doc. Nos. 33, 36.) For the reasons explained below, the court will award $11,310.87 in attorneys’ fees to defendants. BACKGROUND The court will briefly summarize the underlying facts and procedural history of this case below for the sake of clarity. Kern Community College District (“District”) is a public community college district. (Doc. No. 9-1 at ¶ 2.) Plaintiffs Matthew Garrett and Erin Miller are, and at all relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.