Hill

(PC) Harris v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20222:19-cv-01037California361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMMETT HARRIS, No. 2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RICK M. HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2022, defendants filed a motion for terminating sanctions based on plaintiff’s failure to participate in discovery and comply with court orders. ECF No. 38. After plaintiff failed to respond to the motion, he was given an additional twenty-one days to do so. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.