(PC)Ruiz

(PC)Ruiz v. Stane

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20221:22-cv-00236California3,644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00236-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) AND/OR DISMISS M. STANE, ET. AL., ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

17 (Doc. No. 13) 18 Plaintiff Rogelio May Ruiz, a prisoner incarcerated at California State Prison, Corcoran, initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff seeks to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 13, IFP). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three actions or appeals that constitute strikes, and the Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.